Karl Marx Essay

Karl Marx who was christened the father of forward-looking communism was a thoroughly historied philosopher whose ideologies in the political, economy as well as fond perspectives were very significant. To Marx, the content of contrast in association was a study concern and a key point in his ideologies. He hellish the discrepancy in conjunction on the scotch takings. (Healey J 2006). He move more furiousness on the inwardness of turnout which simply implied the tools or materials use in order to ensure that goods and function were produced and distributed.To Marx, the essence of production could vary depending on the prevailing stinting system. In cases of rural societies, land would be an important core of production while for the industrial nightspot the machinery and equipment, factories as well as the merchant marine system were the means of production. Marx further nonable that societies were dominated by capitalistic tendencies in spite of them being agricultural or industrial. To him there atomic number 18 two major social coteriees who are in go on struggle or conflict everyplace the means of production.The two major classes are the bourgeoisie who non only possess but also control the factors of production and it is also the ruling class. (Healey J 2006). The new(prenominal) class comprises of the p sharetariat or the on the job(p)ss class. Marx believed that conflicts between the two distinct classes were eminent or kind of inevitable. The resultant imprint was that the proletariat class would oer propose the bourgeoisie and an equitable society would be attained. In the new society growth and coercion would be a topic of the past.The new society would be a class less society and inequality would be erased and social transport would be attained. Marx presented a remote society that was characterised by continued class struggle. (Healey J 2006) Healey in Race, Ethnicity, Gender and class, noned that guck w eber a German sociologist was a major critic of Marx ideologies. He argued that Marx political theory of inequality in society was a very narrow one. To weber, the inequality conundrum in society was complex and not as simple as Marx presented it.He was quite categorical that inequalities in society could not be tout ensemble goddamned on economic forces. In this see he noted the cases where people whitethorn belong to the elite class in society but lack riches attached to it or vice versa. whatever people may have the wealth but lack the self-importance esteem. (Healey J, 2006) Marx and weber agreed on the issue of inequalities in society. weber expounded on Marx ideologies and he in fact adopted early(a) stratification mechanisms regarding inequalities with ownership and control of factors of production which was mistakable to Karl Marxs class ideology.Secondly, he brought virtually the idea of esteemedness where the amount of find or self esteem stipulation to peo ple by others was highlighted. To weber, factors like class, family melody as well as animal(prenominal) appearance moved(p) the amount of prestige or honour to be set on people by others. The terzetto stratification tally to Weber was world-beater or the ability to influence or control others. A persons stand in political institution de preconditionined how aright they were in the society.To Weber, the threesome groups had similar characteristics in the sense that wealthy, prestigious were likely to be more powerful when compared to the poor people in the society. (Healey J, 2006). some(prenominal) Marx and Weber agreed that the development of capitalism was as a result of stack away capital. However, they differed on how the accumulation was ensured. Marx was convinced that owners of the means of production or the bourgeois acquired considerable capital through and through expropriation and maturation of the on the job(p) class or the proletariat.On the other hand Weber perceived a society where the accumulation of capital was attributed to the dedication, self denial and hard work of the capitalists. As Etzioni Halevy in Social change noted, Weber rafted social change in society as caused not only by the economic factors but also by value and ideas (Etzioni Halery E). Notably, Weber did not belittle the role of or importance of economic factors in as far as social change in society was concerned. Some of Webers viewpoints clear him no fame as they just commix what Marx had earlier presented.The main distinction pertaining his ideologies was his emphasis on the fact that the advent of sophisticated capitalism could not be wholly accuse on the economic factors. (Etzioni-Halevy J, 1981). To him, values had a very significant role to play and to this regard had to be considered with the uniform intensity that was attached to economic factors. grave values cited by Weber include achievement oriented values which worked to spark off th e entrepreneurs to work devotedly while negating from utilisation to embrace investment.He perceived a society where entrepreneurs would instead of consuming their loot re-invest to earn more profits. (Etzioni-Halery J, 1981) To Marx, social change would be realised when the two conflicting classes were no more or when the working class overthrew the ruling class over the means of production. Weber rejected this view point on the argument that social change was a complex formulation which was affected by the class groupings as well as the varying or diverse status. (Allan K, 2005) The working class according to Marx earned a living by selling their labour to the owners of the means of production or capitalists.There was an eminent exploitation between the two classes in the society. Marx coined the term pauperization to mean the process through which the rich became richer as the poor grew poorer. The exploitation was due to the fact that the wages pay to the working class by th e capitalists was not equitable to the work or produce they produced. Apart from receiving poor pay, the working class in poor conditions that negatively affected their mental as well as physical well being. (Giddens A and Griffiths, 2006).Weber backed Marx idea that the society was characterised by conflicts for power as well as resources. On how the society was structured Weber negated from Marx ideology that economic factors alone had a role to play in its determination. In contrast he noted that other important aspects like status as well as party had a role in class differences. concord to Weber they could emerge from other aspects rather than economic forces. He noted that economic differences could arise from other resources rather than lieu for instance skills, qualifications or credentials. Taylor G and Spencer S, 2004). Weber argued that capitalism was not necessarily the detailed factor triggering alienation and deprivation of the working class. Consequently, eliminat ion of the private ownership would not suffice in resolving the inequality issue in the society. Weber blamed the alienation to the omnipotent structures of the bureaucratic witness (Hamilton P, 1991). Weber rejected socialism as a way of resolving the problems associated or linked in capitalism.